Sunday, March 12, 2006

Republican Straw Poll

What the heck they're polling straw men for is beyond me. I thought straw men were bad things? I dunno, but I figured is was 'cause people like that have no heart.

Anyways, Drudge reports that John McCain wanted us to vote for President Bush on the straw poll deallie. I have decided myself, personally, to not vote for George Bush this next upcoming election, seeing as how I have done not liked him anymore. We need somebody new in the White House...a Republican for a change...

That's why I was mildly pleased when I had seen that Blogs for Bush copy and pasted the breakdown from The RCP Blog that said that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist won, in a totally clean election. Even with over half of the votes (52%) coming from Tennessee. No, no bias for Majority Leader Bill---Wait, the Republicans are in the majority? Really? When did that happen?

Shouldn't they, like, be doing something with all that power? Like, making laws and stuff?

Anyways, it's always interesting to hear about how Cereal-Americans are going to vote in the 2008 elections. Now, if some genius could figure out a way to poll us Human-Americans for the 2006 elections, I'd like to hear about that, too.*

*Note: if Blogger had categories, this would go under "silly," as I was having a little fun with an otherwise serious subject. Just blog-warming, you see.

On a related note: The Moderate Voice has a ton of links, including why this is bad for the Republicans. I totally glossed over the McCain angle of "vote for Bush" when I first published this story as nobody knows what to make out of it. It's probably because McCain knew he was losing ground with the people who would actually attend this conference, thus he wanted to make sure it looked like he didn't care. It's yet to be seen wether or not McCain has national influence.

Curiouser and Curiouser: Ankle Biting Pundits points out more freakiness in the poll than I originally thought.

According to my sources, the Hotline folks have colluded with representatives from Sen. Bill Frist's organization to alter the straw poll ballots to allow attendees at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference a second choice. Why? Because the “write in Bush” vote of confidence campaign had apparently gained so much momentum that it became clear a majority of voters would indeed write in the president’s name.

According to my sources, Frist’s team approached the Hotline people with the idea to rejigger the ballots because, as we have reported, Frist has a whole lot riding on this straw poll victory. Frist’s organization VolPAC spent over $100,000 bussing in, boarding, feeding, and entertaining over 930 “ringers.”

And, now the Hotline says Frist "was encouraged by the show of support, but added that he would use it to boost those Republicans up in '06, and particularly those vying to replace him in the Senate," and "that the delegates did want to support their President, but noted that many of them had "driven 6 to 8 hours" to participate and wanted to take part in choosing their party's next WH nominee."

On Mitt Romney's second-place finish, Romney very quietly, worked with some Volunteer state supporters to bring in some college students from Union University. The school, which, btw, is affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, is in Jackson, TN, in between Memphis and Nashville. Also note in the story, the efforts of Romney's Southern [Baptist] backers to cast him as the best candidate in the field for evangelicals.

Wow, and I thought I was just gonna be silly all day! Turns out there's a ton more drama goin' on that I thought possible.

John blogs at MacStansbury.org and does really know what Straw man means

Something about yourself

Keeping things going with macstansbury's "tell me something about you" theme,

Here's one, I'm interested in your responses. I'll call it "A Severe Mercy", with apologies to C.S. Lewis.

Your moron puppy, who has been tormented by squirrels in the back yard, finally bags one who doesn't get to the tree in time. You manage to get idiot dog off of it, and a brief examination seems to indicate Mr. Squirrel ain't long for this world, however you are no doctor and it's possible he could pull through. You just don't know.

What do you do?

a) pull the dog inside and wait for Mr. Squirrel to join the choir invisible
b) let the dog finish him
c) call a vet and spend an afternoon saving a squirrel
d) send him across the river Styx with a .38 and a penny in his paws

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Ex-Yugoslav Leader Milosevic Burns in Hell

Oh, read that wrong. It's actually "Ex-Yugoslav Leader Milosevic Dies in Cell." You can see how I messed that up. First day jitters and whatnot.

Ed Morrissey has more.

UPDATE: Point Five scooped us all!

John blogs at MacStansbury.org, and not here, if he keeps using titles like that

Red Meat

Aw right! We got news on Saturday night!

http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060310200409990002&ncid=NWS00010000000001


A Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services in the Bush Administration. Dude's been rippin off Target.

He has a million dollar home too. My goodness. That's a lot of Target rippin off.

I say it's just another example of the Republican culture of corruption.

Tell me a bit about yourself

Rather than try and fool you into thinking I'm a deep-thinker, I've decided to go the route of "blog-warming." That means, I'm not gonna give RWS any chance to think she can just let me do all the work, like some people. What really impresses me about this little corner of the blogohextraweb is the commenters. Youse guyse.

While it seems like I've gone from zero to pander in less than 2 seconds, I'm not. One of the reasons I got this gig in the first place was my keen ability to figure things out, and my ability to empathize with the peeps. Strangely enough, there's yet another one of those quiz-things going around that pretty much proved that:



The thing I tell people when they're writing their thesis or their entrance essays to college and the like, is to make a history of it. Show whoever is interviewing you that you have a master plan, and that you're already working on it. I have a simple way of putting it all together; start with an example of what you're doing now, where you hope to be someday, and how the job/degree/loan/whatever is just part of that plan. So too, am I doing that here.

Take the test. Find out about yourself. Then, maybe, you'll tell me a bit about yourself.

ADDED: My Personal Dna Report.

John is still holding on to his day-job at MacStansbury.org

I did it!

HA! Sparkles is on the road and has no idea that I've HACKED IN to her site!

Oh man this is gonna be great! I know I've got at least 18 hours before she has a chance to check in, and I'll bet you a paycheck she doesn't bother until tomorrow night some time.

The havoc I can wreak between now and then.

Muh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaa!



I think I will have a glass of wine and contemplate this awesome power I now control.

Friday, March 10, 2006

Heaven on earth.

I'm busy packing here and I will be leaving tomorrow for the beach. I am leaving the blog in capable hands and I will be checking in. I thought I might leave you with a re-post on why I love the beach so much. I wrote this one last summer.


When I was growing up we had a beach house in Gulf Shores, Alabama. It was long before the condos and the golf resorts were built. The house was old and musty with a screened in back porch and I loved it so.

In those early teen years when one gets introspective and broody, I would walk down to the beach at night and lay on the sand. Looking up at the sky, I would raise my hand and touch each star.

The sound of the ocean immediately calms me even today. The smell of the salt air takes me back to when I had no worries and no one to worry about.

My heart yearns for the ocean. I use to say that I would travel to as many beaches on this earth as I could. And I have made quite a few, but there are still sands my toes have yet to feel.

Those nights laying on the sand, feeling the breath of the ocean in my hair, and hearing the symphony of the waves, I would dream about the vast unknown that was to be my life. I would ask God his opinion and I could hear him whisper back in the music of the water.

Even today, I think there is nothing more beautiful than the ocean at night. The moonlight sparkles across the rolling waves and the stars glitter in the heavens. It is there I feel the closest to what the beginning of this earth must have been like. It is there I find it hard to understand how anyone could imagine that this gift of nature was not given by one who loves us so much that He would create such a thing of beauty and life for us to enjoy.

The Da Vinci Code....no big deal.

Agence France Presse reports:

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops launched a new website refuting key claims made in Dan Brown's novel that are likely to be brought to the big screen in Howard's movie, starring Tom Hanks.

"'The Da Vinci Code' is a mess, a riot of laughable errors and serious misstatements. Almost every page has at least one of each," the bishops wrote on the website Jesusdecoded.com.

"What this novel does (is) ... asks people to consider equivalent to the mainstream Christian tradition quite a few odd claims. Some are merely distortions of hypotheses advanced by serious scholars who do serious research. Others, however, are inaccurate or false," the site claims.

I read the "Da Vinci Code" and "Angel and Demons" when they first came out. I enjoyed both books. They were both very well written. It never occurred to me to take anything in the books seriously. It was fiction after all. I read all sorts of books with themes or stories regarding Catholicism and Christianity that are untrue. The nature of fiction is that one can write what they wish. Then I started reading about premises in the books that were being advanced as having some merit. I have read many things by scholars regarding the history of my faith. Some true, some false, some speculation. Many novels take a bit of history and then add their own twist to it. It happens all the time.

I just don't get the uproar over this. I understand why the Bishops felt a need to put out this website since so many people seem to be taking this novel way too seriously. But I don't believe that Catholics should be up in arms about it. It's just a book. It's just a movie.

Children of Change.

You all know how I love the milblogs. Sometimes I find the most bittersweet posts. It's like reading someone's letter to home. I feel honored that these soldiers open their souls to us. Surfing this morning I found American Soldier, who is injured now btw, so keep him in your prayers, but I was looking through his posts and found this:

"Many nights I have watched the sunset fall in this land of turmoil. I have seen the beauty here and I have seen the hope of the people. We have a very long road before the sun will set in peace here. I sometimes think as the sun goes down what will become of this place. Long after we do leave here, will these children make a difference or fall into the same footsteps of their fathers, brothers or uncles before them? I would only hope that the children I have seen will persevere. With any luck they will build their squander huts into houses. They will cover the holes of their kin'’s death devices. I would hope that they will respect their woman as we do in America.

I read in the news about the things happening in the US and I think that the subtle bickering that the left and right is miniscule compared to the issues that Iraq has right now. Will there be a day when the Iraqi people will have nothing better to do than argue about the things that we as Americans have so much time to debate about?"

That made me smile. To think (hope) that one dayIraqis will be on the net like us, debating issues of the day, not worrying about idiots who blow themselves up.

Do you ever think about how blessed we are? How wonderful it is to be able to speak your mind and to work for what you believe in.

I'm not sure how this war will turn out. I cling to the hope that braver hearts and minds will turn the direction of the Middle East into a more civilized place. I talk to people all the time who don't believe that is possible. They think that the people of the Middle East will never change. But one constant runs throughout the milblog posts I read. That is the children. Their attitude is much different than the adults. They see the soldiers as ones who brings them gifts and candy. This may seem like so little, but that first impression will stay with them. I want to believe that these children will be the ones who really turn things around for the future. The are the key I believe.

Their fathers and mothers may begin the dream, but they will be the ones who fulfill it.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Dubai Ports Issue...

It's over.

Michelle reports thru CNN:

"A United Arab Emirates-owned company has agreed to turn over all of its operations at U.S. ports to an American entity, Sen. John Warner said Thursday.
Reading a statement from DP World on the Senate floor, Warner, a Virginia Republican, said the reason is "to preserve" the strong relationship between the UAE and United States.
The announcement comes after congressional leaders reportedly told President Bush that the deal for DP World to assume some operations at six U.S. ports appeared dead on Capitol Hill.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Illinois, and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tennessee, delivered the news to Bush during a meeting Thursday at the White House, two Republican sources said."


Michelle has more with links, reactions ect..

I see this as a win win all around. The situation gets resolved in the manner the people wanted and Bush doesn't look like a wimp that caved. The Republican congress looks like it stood strong on the issue so it can't be used against them in the elections AND our Middle Eastern friends can't be mad at Bush on the matter since he stood up for them.

Give Yale the finger....umm..nail.

Clinton W. Taylor of Townhall.com has this post regarding the Taliban official Sayeed Rahmatullah Hashemi who is in a special student program at Yale.

Since the Taliban sees fit to pull the fingernails off women who dare to wear fingernail polish, Taylor thought it might make a big statement to send Yale's Office of Development some "glamorous, decadent, shameless-hussy-scarlet press-on nails" to make the point that admitting this type of person is unacceptable. Please mail those nails (with comments)!!

Yale University Office of Development
P.O. Box 2038
New Haven, CT 06521-2038

And don't forget Yale's President!

President Richard C. Levin
Woodbridge Hall
Yale University
New Haven Connecticut 06520

I think the left and right can get together on this one, can't we???

Whatever you decide to do, let Taylor hear about it at nailyale@hotmail.com. He is going to try collect the best responses for a future column.

Roe v. Wade for Men.

JackLewis.net brings us this interesting story:

From the Associated Press...

Contending that women have more options than they do in the event of an unintended pregnancy, men's rights activists are mounting a long shot legal campaign aimed at giving them the chance to opt out of financial responsibility for raising a child.

The National Center for Men has prepared a lawsuit — nicknamed Roe v. Wade for Men — to be filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Michigan on behalf of a 25-year-old computer programmer ordered to pay child support for his ex-girlfriend's daughter. The suit addresses the issue of male reproductive rights, contending that lack of such rights violates the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause.

The gist of the argument: If a pregnant woman can choose among abortion, adoption or raising a child, a man involved in an unintended pregnancy should have the choice of declining the financial responsibilities of fatherhood. The activists involved hope to spark discussion even if they lose....

Feit's organization has been trying since the early 1990s to pursue such a lawsuit, and finally found a suitable plaintiff in Matt Dubay of Saginaw, Mich.Dubay says he has been ordered to pay $500 a month in child support for a girl born last year to his ex-girlfriend. He contends that the woman knew he didn't want to have a child with her and assured him repeatedly that — because of a physical condition — she could not get pregnant.

Of course I would never advocate a man not taking responsibility for his child. There are consequences of sex (some of us like to call them blessings) and we all know it, and no assurance or condom is going to eliminate the possibility of a child being created. But I don't think their point is really about neglecting their duties as much as pointing out the hypocrisy of allowing a woman to decide what she wants to do with THEIR child and the man having to live with the consequences no matter what.

Black and White.

Last night I watched that "30 days" show again and it was about a white family being transformed into a black family and a black family being transformed into white family. They then go out into society and see what it feels like to be the other race.

It was interesting. The white guy kept insisting that as long has one was polite and nice, it didn't matter what skin color one was. He said on his first day of being black that he was treated no differently. (He went to a car dealership and to a clothing store) He kept insisting it so much that the black guy started to get ticked off. I started to get a bit irritated myself. The white guy had a point about attitude being a part of it and about seeing prejudice where there is none, but there is no doubt that prejudice still exists. For example, The black guy, disguised as white, takes a job as a bartender in a bar in a local neighborhood. He asks a white guy sitting at the bar what the neighborhood is like. The guy tells him it's a great neighborhood. One of the last "white" neighborhoods around the area, a place where it was actually safe to raise your kids.

Pretty appalling.

The black woman, disguised as a white woman, sits in on an all white discussion on race. One guy admits that when he shakes hands with a black person his first reaction is to wipe his hand. He says he doesn't like to feel that way, but he does. Imagine how that made the black woman feel.

I think the show illustrated how both sides don't see what the other side sees. Not to make excuses for the guy at the bar, but how is it different to say that a white neighborhood is safer when the black man admits the crime problem in black neighborhoods?

Another thing I felt strange about was when the black guy said that while he was working as a white guy he had to "articulate more" or as he said "talk white." Why should speaking well be a white thing??? Later they show his son disguised as white with the white girl saying he wasn't going to change his speech patterns. "You can't watch your slang?" asks the girl. "I gotta be who I am," he replies. He already believes that using black slang is "who he is." I don't think using proper english should be considered a "white thing," do you?

I chaperoned a dance recently where another mother was discussing how glad she was that there weren't many blacks at the school. I said, "how can you say such a thing?" She rolled her eyes, "I'm just being honest. With them comes drugs, crime, and godawful music." I just walked away.

I realize that high crime and high illegitimacy rates in black neighborhoods have garnered this kind of thinking. But is that fair to the many blacks who are successful? Honestly I think that with many of us, both white and black, we don't know how to react to each other, so we avoid each other. We certainly avoid any discussion of race. It's too easy to make waves. It's too easy to offend. Many white people feel they can't speak out against the crime and illegitimacy without sounding racist. Many black people feel they can't speak out against it or they will be called an "Uncle Tom." Recently Spike Lee slammed Condi Rice. What does it say to young black people to have someone they admire, like Spike Lee, slam an incredibly intelligent successful black woman? And then to have the rap song "It's Hard Out Here For A Pimp" win an oscar? Talk about a mixed up message!

I'm looking forward to seeing the rest of "Black and White." So far, it just seems that neither side understands the other, which may just be the way it really is.

Let's see this more often.

Even though I haven't been convinced that the Dubai ports deal is really dangerous, I have to admire Congress for what looks like stepping up to plate and refusing to let the deal go through. I would have liked to see Republicans do this on some spending bills that Bush put through. When Bush insists on throwing good money after bad in education, transport and entitlement programs, I wish Republicans would show this kind of backbone.

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Open Thread.

Just responding to the comments in the last few posts have exhausted me. It's been a busy week and I'm tired. I wanted you guys to know that I will be leaving on Saturday for a week for spring break. I hope to not think about politics for a week and just enjoy seeing my family. BigDog and MacStansbury have graciously accepted my request to guest blog for me. So I guess the estrogen levels will be lower around here next week.

I also wanted to thank everyone who answered my survey questions a few days ago. It was certainly informative! Who knew I had so many commenters who didn't agree with hardly anything I blog about? Thank you for all the nice comments too.

Question for Cindy Sheehan.

Smash gets a bit rough.

I have to say that I winced at the question. No matter what someone does to seemingly deserve it, I don't see the purpose in being cruel. One can argue that Cindy brings this on herself, and it is true that as long as she puts herself out there as she does, she has to expect this kind of questioning.

I don't like someone beating up on a mother who has lost her son. But there are many who feel that she is beating up on mothers who have lost their sons and daughters in this war by implying that they died for nothing. That is cruel as well.

Smash fought in this war, so he has right to say what he feels as Cindy does. I can understand his anger at this woman. But, as the saying goes, two wrongs don't make a right. Let's lay off Cindy. Let her go through her grieving process. We don't score any points this way.

How We Win The War On Terror.

If you wish to read a concise and well put speech that lays out why the way the U.S. dealt with terrorists before did not work, and the strategy of this administration to win the war on terror, read Dick Cheney's speech before AIPIC in Washington yesterday. It is excellent.

via Powerline

Wow.

Maureen Dowd admits a mistake and it's a whopper:

"Correction My column of Feb. 18 said that Scooter Libby testified that ''superiors'' had authorized him to leak classified information about Valerie Plame. Rather, Mr. Libby testified that ''superiors'' had authorized him to leak classified information from an intelligence report to rebut critics and justify the Iraq war, not information about Valerie Plame."

via NRO

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Iran is really starting to tick me off.

ABC News is reporting that Intelligence officials are saying weapons responsible for increasing U.S. deaths in Iraq are being made in Iran.

"March 6, 2006 — U.S. military and intelligence officials tell ABC News that they have caught shipments of deadly new bombs at the Iran-Iraq border."

A History of Conscience.

As I was reading this article about a comedy they are filming in Germany about Hitler, it got me to thinking about how the youth today view the horrors of yesterday.

When I was around 12 yrs old I read "The Diary of Anne Frank" and Corrie Ten Boom's "The Hiding Place" which was about a Dutch Christian family that hid Jews during the Holocaust and was later taken to the concentration camps.

I was beside myself with horror after reading them. I bugged my mom and dad with questions for weeks. They tried to explain, but I just could not fathom the evil that had happened not so long ago. How could this have happened? How could good people have allowed this?? No answer satisfied me. It was my first look into the darkness of man's heart.

I also happened to be living through the civil rights movement in Mississippi at the time, so human rights were literally a part of my every day life, as I was one of the first white children to attend a formerly all black public school. To me every day was a lesson about the direction we were headed on how we treat our fellow man.

As I grew up, I consoled myself with what I had seen with discrimination of blacks, by the progress we had made. With laws in place protecting equal rights and the strides so many blacks were making in law, politics, medicine, and business, it seemed we had turned a very important corner and I was proud of that.

The Holocaust still haunted me though. The scope of the horror. The reasons. I could just never understand how good people could stand by and let so many suffer and die. Saint Maximillian Kolbe became my favorite saint. He was a Priest who was sent to Auschwitz for helping the refugees and Jews and it was there that he gave his life for another. (I encourage you to read the link provided and remember Father Kolbe if you ever feel a need to criticize Christians)

Then "Schindler's List" came out and I felt that would surely give the younger generations a clear picture of history, not only of the horror of it, but of the compassion as well.

I was wrong.

In the past 10 years I have served as an asst. youth minister, a CCD teacher for high school, a substitute teacher in public high school, and I have 3 teenagers. I've been around the youth quite a bit. I started noticing how kids would make jokes about things one should never joke about, like the holocaust or rape, or abortion. I would say something to them and I was told to "lighten up." This younger generation has been saturated with comedy where nothing is sacred. "Southpark" and "The American Pie" movies and all types of music thought pushing the envelope was great fun. But I am afraid that that part of our culture proved to have more of an impact on our youth than "Schindler's list" ever did.

I used to read the High School message board where my son sometimes posted. I can promise you that you would be shocked at what young people write when they think no adult will be reading it. Jokes about Jews and the Holocaust are common. The sexual jokes are over the top with knowledge about perversions that I had never even heard of. Insults are as mean and ugly as they get. Women are degraded and porn commonly referred to. There is no shock and sorrow about what happened to the Jews or to blacks in this country. If history is referred to at all, it is referred to in a mocking way. There are no good guys, no bad guys. There are only jokes. If you think your kids aren't exposed to this kind of thing every day, then you are only fooling yourself.

Dave Chapelle thought exaggerating the stereotypes of blacks as lazy crackheads would be funny. It looks like kids thought that it was funny, but at what price? Now kids think nothing of making those same jokes using the "n' word frequently. Are they serious or joking? Who can tell? And should that make a difference?

One of the reasons I posted a while back on how disgusted I was when anyone used Hitler or Nazi's to measure some wrong they see today is because I understood how that looks to the youth. Many lefties in the blogopshere call Bush "Bushilter" and people like Cindy Sheehan and Harry Belafonte call him the real "terrorist." So what message does that send to kids? We all know that calling Bush any sort of Hitler is ridiculous, no matter how much one disagrees with him. And reasonable people know what a real terrorist is, but to our kids it just sounds like we are equating whatever we disagree with with real evil. So it ends up diluting the power of the lessons we should have learned from our history.

Our children are losing the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. Why? Because we, on both sides, have been so determined to paint our side as right, we use whatever comparison we can to equate the other side as evil. Combine that with Hollywood's ongoing trend to push the envelope with comedy about things that are no joking matter, and you end up with generations who can't figure out who is really right and who is really wrong, so why bother fighting for anything?

The same Hollywood that rants about the evil of this war and wonders why more young people aren't appalled by the death of those on the battlefield, is the same Hollywood that has been cranking out films of horror and death so graphic and gory that the real thing hardly bothers anyone anymore.

And on top of all that, we have a media so intent on getting the story first, or making it as sensational as possible, that we are not sure of what the truth is anymore.

Why should someone fight for democracy in the Middle East when others say that fighting it is wrong? Why should someone fight against abortion when others say it is constitutional right? Why should someone fight against euthanasia when others say it is more humane for the elderly to be put to sleep? Why should someone fight against pornography when others say it is their right to see it?

So we are left with a society that places personal desire above all else. And I think that I finally have a answer to the question that has haunted me since I was 12 yrs old. How did good people let the Holocaust happen?

They pushed aside their conscience. They let it happen because they didn't know which side was right.

Polls. Polls.

You guys know I hate polls, but I have a bet going with one of my commenters (Dumbya) who was insisting that the CBS poll a few days ago that showed Pres. Bush's job approval ratings at 34 percent was only going to go down.

Well a new Washington Post/ABC poll shows Bush at a 41 percent job approval rating. So if Bush can hold that and stay above 34% for a few weeks, then I win the bet. Which means Dumbya will have to post 10 nice things about President Bush. (I shoulda bet hard cold cash)

Monday, March 06, 2006

The gap between the rich and the poor myth.

Busted.

I was arguing with a commenter the other day about this. The liberal talking point of the growing gap between the rich and the poor. The Federal reserve came out with their triannual survey of family income and the press put their usual worst possible spin on it.

But as TSC Daily points out:

"The rich didn't get richer; the rich got poorer while most everybody else did ok."

Read the whole thing. I'm not a numbers girl. I go by what I see, but I always find it interesting when anyone can find numbers to support their belief. Yes, I realize that means mine also, but I just never have bought the "growing gap between the rich and the poor" theory.

h/t BigDog

Stephen Colbert is at it again.

Townhall has this: (emphasis mine)

"Last Friday, the House Republican Theme Team, chaired byJack Kingston, hosted a blogging workshop for House Republican press secretaries. The workshop featured panels of bloggers and press secretaries to talk about ways the Hill and the blogosphere can interact. Midway through the event, a special guest dropped by - Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central's Colbert Report.

Colbert told the group that he was interviewing two Democrats that afternoon. What can I say to them that will tear them a new one?" asked the comedian."

When are my lefty commenters going to start warning your guys!!!!??? I'm trying to be helpful here in the spirit of bi-partisan love.....;-)

*personal note-I also watch Colbert and think he is just as hilarious as Jon, if not more.

In case you are keeping count..

Cindy Sheehan arrested again.

Jon Stewart isn't just bad for the Oscars.

This Harvard educated liberal thinks that Jon Stewart is bad for liberalism. He basically says that younger brighter liberal minds on average get their news of the day from Jon Stewart on The Daily Show, who makes fun of politicians and government officials by making them out to be buffoons.

This causes the young liberals to not go into the circus world of politics, but into the private sector.

An interesting view to be sure, but I would question whether someone who gets their news from The Daily Show is really all that bright. Book sense does not necessarily mean one has common sense.

I was surprised to learn this in the article:

"According to a survey by the Pew Research Center, only 2 percent of the show's audience identify themselves as conservatives."

I guess the conservative's young and brightest aren't getting their news from The Daily Show.

Good to know.

*personal note: I don't get my news from The Daily Show, but I do watch it and I think Jon Stewart is hilarious.

via Powerline

The Military Wins.

Those who didn't want military recruiters on college campus lose at the Supreme Court.

Actually they can legally refuse military recruiters, they just can't get any federal money if they do.

Let' see what's more important, federal money or principles.

Do you even have to ask?

Sunday, March 05, 2006

A Question..

for you guys....

It has been suggested to me a few times to pay a website developer to design my own site. (this one is chosen from a several at blogspot) I know that I would post more pictures if it were easier and I could group them. I'm not sure how beyond designing some awesome cool webpage, it would make much of a difference though.

What do you think?

Ridiculous.

How does one hear this sentence regarding how Tony Blair's decision to go to war will be judged:


"If you have faith about these things then you realize that judgment is made by other people. If you believe in God, it's made by God as well."

And then write this in The New York Times:

"Prime Minister Tony Blair has indicated that God influenced his deliberations when he committed British troops to fight alongside American forces in Iraq." via Michelle

This is the problem with so many in the press. They hear what they want to hear. They hear what their preconceived ideas are. More on this here.

There was a time when invoking God would not have brought such a controversy. It would have even been even expected of leaders. What does it say about our societies that a leader mentioning God brings such a reaction? (Unless your Bill Clinton, then they ignore you because they know you don't mean it)

The Civil War That Wasn't.

The Washington Times:

"The top U.S. commander in Iraq yesterday declared an end to a 10-day wave of sectarian violence that killed an estimated 350 civilians, asserting that many reports of violence were “exaggerated.”
***snip***
He also said the number of violent incidents turned out to be lower than press and security forces reported in the immediate aftermath of the bombing of the revered Shi’ite Askariya mosque in Samarra, north of Baghdad. Gen. Casey said that in a reported 30 attacks on mosques, only two were severely damaged. Of eight mosques that were reported damaged, inspections showed only one had damage—a broken window.
***snip***
Despite the sectarian violence, the number of suicide bombers in Iraqi in February stood at 17, about half the total in January. Last summer, there were about 60 per month. Suicide-bomber attacks are the main tactic of al Qaeda in Iraq, the foreign infiltrators whose numbers have declined in the face of tighter border-control measures."


But what about what Iraqi's think?

Arab News : has more. Read the whole thing it is excellent.

Amir Taheri says he was bombarded with invitations on TV news programs for the past two weeks to discuss the impending Iraq civil war. It seems that fizzled out. Taheri says there will be no civil war.

Taheri says one of the reasons that tension has grown in Iraq in the last few week is "...the growing desperation of the terrorist groups that, having failed to sabotage the political process and keep the Arab Sunnis out of the last general election, have decided on what could be their last throw of the dice."

But rest assured: (emphasis mine)

" But the new course Iraq has taken away from despotic rule and toward democracy cannot be reversed. Those who look of civil war had better look elsewhere as the overwhelming majority of the Iraqis remain determined not to walk into the trap laid by the terrorists.
As always the real battle for Iraq is taking place outside that country, especially in the United States and Britain. As long as there are steady hands there this ship will not be blown off course by any storm that the terrorists or others could conjure."


As opposed to what people have commented here, I do not see Iraq as going perfectly. Not at all. Those who think that just because I supported the war means I don't see the mistakes that were made, are wrong. But the people speaking above are not pundits. THEY ARE LIVING THIS WAR. I listen to them. I think you should too.

Update: A pundit's view on the ground. "Dude, Where's My Civil War?"

Saturday, March 04, 2006

In Love.

Here is another one of my favorite posts. This one about love.

A while back I decided to try and find my best friend from high school. She had married a friend a mine and settled in my hometown and I had last seen her at my father's funeral 20 yrs ago. I thought it would be fairly easy. We didn't go to the same high school, but I had many friends at hers and my boyfriend had gone there. In my search I found a 20 yr reunion website for her high school and found pictures and information on my old boyfriend. As I sat looking at pictures of this man who had broken my heart at 16, who had aged as we all have, I remembered what it was like to be so young and so in love.

The summer I was 15 I met him after a highschool baseball game. He was a gifted athlete and would later play college ball. Meeting him was literally like being hit by a truck. I was a rare confident teen. I had boyfriends since I was in 1st grade. It had all been fun and games up to this point. But this, this was love.

My usual witty responses got stuck in my throat. My confidence in my looks disappeared. He seemed to like me as well, but unfortunately his cousin liked me a lot and he didn't want to hurt his cousin. I would see him at games, at the pizza hut we hung out and I would start to shake. My heart would pound. I HATED IT! I tried to make this feeling go away. My interest in other boys disappeared. I could hardly eat. All I could think about was this guy. It was like listening to the same song all day long. And there was no way I could find to turn it off.

Finally, the situation resolved itself and he called and asked me out. I don't remember the conversation. I remember hanging up and almost passing out. I laid on my bed, put my hands to my face and screamed.

I honestly don't remember that first date either. I think I must have been in such a state of nirvana that it was almost like a drug induced high. I call it a love blackout.

I turned 16 and it was the summer of love. When I finally got to the point where I could actually breathe around him, we started to have fun together. It was a rollercoaster ride of emotions for me. The high when he called and the low when he didn't. He never treated me badly, but it was clear that I was crazy in love with this guy and he.....well....he liked me a lot, but there was a wall there I could not break through. I remember lying with him on the couch in my living room and my head on his chest listening to his heartbeat. I would close my eyes and try to will his heart to love me.

Loving someone more than they love you is so painful I don't think I could have ever gone through it again. When we were together I would soar. But when he didn't call for days I would fall into a depression I have never experienced since. On the one hand I was so grateful to be with him when I was that I never complained about the times when I was not. So I made it pretty easy for him to take me for granted and he did.

Then the day came when I found out he had cheated on me. (Then that just meant he had gone out with someone else) I may have been in love, but I still had my dignity. Cheating was not something I would ever put up with. I wrote him a terse note and that was that.

For about a month I soaked my pillow each night with my tears. I didn't just feel my heart was broken, I felt it had been torn to pieces. But after a while I put the pieces back together and went forward. I will always be grateful that he never took physical advantage of the love I had for him. I thought of myself as pretty strong, but he had a way of making me pretty weak.

But the story doesn't end there.

I learned many things from my first love. I learned to never let yourself love someone who takes you for granted. I learned to never let the thought of losing someone let them walk all over you.

A few years later after we had both gone to different colleges, we saw each other at a club. He called me and wanted to see me again. I'm not saying my heart didn't flutter a bit, but the scars had kept me from the soaring feeling of love I had felt before. Over the next few years we saw each other when we could. He said to me once, "You're not falling in love with me like before." I replied, "No, I learned my lesson." Did this bother him? I am not sure. Like before there was still a wall there I could never break through. But I was in full control this time. No more broken hearts for me.

But still..... That girl who had been crazy in love was hiding behind my heart waiting for him to go crazy and be in love with her the same way. My senior year in college he called to tell me that his college baseball team was playing my college that weekend. He said he would call me when he got there. He did. He told me he had about an hour before practice and could I come to the athletic dorm and see him.

Now this may seem like an insignificant detail, but you will understand at the end. At this time in the early 80's all curly long hair was in, right? I had straight long hair. I was so excited about seeing him I didn't bother to stop and roll my hair though. I just flew out the door and drove over there. When I got to him I gave him a big hug and he looks at me and says with a slight smile, "Thanks for fixing your hair for me."

In that moment I knew that I would never make this man happy. I knew that I would never be smart enough, be pretty enough, or love him enough. As much as my heart yearned for him, my mind knew better. A deep sadness flowed through me.

He said, "I'll see you at the game tomorrow, right?" "Yes," I replied, "I'll be there." But I didn't go to that game the next day and I never saw him again.

He has married, divorced, remarried and has 3 children. He lives in my hometown. I saw a picture of his wife and wondered if she had broken down that wall.

I never did find my best friend. She had divorced my friend and remarried. Sometimes we lose things that are so precious to us and we just never find them again.

So it goes.

Don't forget.

Please scroll down to the Open Thread post and leave your response to my questions. I want to get as many as possible. Thanks!!!!!!!

Choosing.

Since weekends are slow I'm going to post some of my favorite posts from the past. I've reposted this before so many of you have probably seen it, but for new readers this one is my number one. I renamed it though. Enjoy.


I want to tell you about a little boy who was born in 1931. He was born to a poor 15 yr old girl who was married to an older man in the rural south. As you might imagine, it was not an easy childhood. Having a young unsure mother and a overbearing mean father along with no money brought feelings of anger out in the little boy often. When that happened his father would beat him. His mother would cry, but there wasn't much she could do.

Finally his father left them, divorced his mother and remarried. This was uncommon in the 40's and humiliated his mother and left the little boy feeling even more feelings of anger and abandonment. The small glow of rage that had been smoldering for many years, began to grow.

Luckily for his mother, she found a sweet man to marry and they began a family. By this time the little boy, growing into a teenager was rebellious and uncontrollable. Feeling it for the best, His mother and stepfather sent him to a boarding school. His mother had 2 more babies. Feeling left out and alone, the boy turned his anger outward. He started fights. He found enjoyed fights. They let a little bit of his rage out.

When he graduated high school he returned home and spent his weekends going to bars, getting drunk and getting into fights. He enjoyed the feeling of rage and anger as he pounded at someone. He enjoyed the taunting, the final insult that led to the fight, but most of all he enjoyed the fight. It didn't take a psychologist to figure out that the fight gave him an outlet for his resentment and rage.

This went on for almost 2 years, until one night everything changed. Sometimes people actually do have one specific moment in their lives when life grabs them and shakes them and nothing is ever the same.

The boy (he was called Sonny) ,was now a man of 19. He was doing his usual drinking in a favorite bar. He started his usual fight with some other redneck over the usual nothing. The fighting began, then Sonny knocked the other man into the bar. As the man fell his head hit the corner of the bar. The man fell to the floor, blood was everywhere. People rushed over. A man knelt down by him and then looked up at Sonny and said "he's dead."

In that moment, Sonny saw what the rest of his life was to be. Prison. He saw the bars and the cot and the cold hard floor. He closed his eyes, overwhelmed by the frozen fear that washed over him. He wasn't sure how long he stood there with his eyes closed. But someone shook him and he looked up. They said, "He's not dead, just a a bad gash to the back of the head."

Sonny didn't remember the rest of the evening. Back then no one called cops over some honkey tonk fight. He didn't remember getting home. He only remembers laying in bed, staring at the ceiling. He remembers thinking and thinking. He remembers that he understood how close he came to having no life at all. And that is when he made a decision.

He decided that not only was he going to have a life, he was going to have a damn good one.

That week he joined the Army. He made sergeant quickly. He worked hard and was focused. After his stint in the Army. He took his G.I. bill and enrolled in college. He studied hard and graduated. He wanted to go to law school, but he needed to work to save some money. He sold insurance. During this time he met a beautiful young girl, appropriately named Joy. He knew within a week that she was the kind of girl he wanted to love and to be the mother of his much wanted children. A week later they were married. This guy had gotten real good at making decisions by now.

He got into Law School. He worked all day as a security guard at a train station, where he could easily study, and he went to law school at night. He and Joy had 2 sons. He became a lawyer. Then they had a daughter. He had many other successes in his life. But the personal ones are the most significant. He forgave his father and even had a relationship with him. His mother had become widowed at an early age, and he took care of her and became very close to her. He also loved his little brother and sister very much. But even more than all that, he became a remarkable person. He made a lot of money and he gave it to anyone who needed it.

Because of his childhood,he felt little boys needed an outlet for their aggressiveness, so he became a Golden Gloves boxing coach. He sponsored his son's little league teams and any other team that couldn't afford one. He gave money and land to The Boys Club. He headed up fundraisers for the Crippled Childrens charity through his civic clubs. His generosity was unlimited. He was never famous or held high office. But when he died too young, at the age of 53 ,the funeral home did not have enough rooms to hold the flowers, despite his wife asking for donations to other charitable funds. There were 11 police cars and 11 police motorcycles leading the hearst to the cemetery.

He was not perfect. But he was a loving and wonderful husband and father. I know. Because he was my father.

When I was 17 I had a boyfriend who came from a poor family. Keith stole some engine parts from the gas station where he worked to sell for extra money. Instead of forbidding me to ever see him again, Daddy got Keith out of jail. He got the arrest off his record. He managed to find him a scholarship to the local Jr. College and gave him money to get started. I began college farther away and my Daddy waited patiently for the relationship to end, and it did.

What my father taught me most of all is that life is a decision you make. Every day you decide whether you will be happy or not. My dad had nothing but rage fueling him growing up. He could have let that rage ruin it all and he almost did. But that fateful night he decided to turn it all around. He decided to be a wonderful husband, father, friend, and public servant.

He chose love over hate.

He was a senator in the state legislature and then ran for Circuit Clerk of Hinds County. After the first time, no one ever ran against him again. He always ran uncontested. He was asked many times to run for Governor, but I would hear him discussing it with my mom. He didn't like the meanness of politics and he didn't want to spend time away from his kids. So he never did.

He was not a religious man. When we were young he took us to church, but when I was 12 and joined the Baptist church because of the youth group, he and mom stopped going. When I questioned him about it later. He told me, "I am Christian, but I don't like how churches focus on things that I don't see Christ focusing on. When I read the Bible I saw Christ asking us to do 2 things, love God, and help one another. So that is what I did."

My father died before I finished my spiritual journey (which is never finished, I suppose) and I wish that I could have shared with him how fufilling I have found my Church and how much it has taught me about Christ. But I figure, because of the love he gave me, because of the childhood of security and affection that I had, I started from a whole different place than he did. He climbed the mountain from the bottom, digging in and sweating his way up. I was placed gently toward the top. My climb was so much easier by all that he gave me.

He has been gone for 20 years now, but I am still thankful for him. Still thankful that somewhere out there is a man with a big scar on the back of his head. Still thankful for the decision my daddy made all those many years ago.

Friday, March 03, 2006

Even the MSM will tell the real story...

if they are actually there telling the story. NBC has a reporter (a local Iraqi journalist) blogging from Baghdad.

Ewwwww.....

You guys remember last week when I was having a argument with a gentleman regarding changing the definition of marriage? I voiced my concern over the pandora's box that would be opened and he thought I was silly for thinking that incest or polygamy or bestiality would actually be put forward.

Well, in Massachusetts Rep. David Paul Linsky (D) wants the state to legalize sex with animals Here’s part of his bill:


SECTION 7. Section 34 of Chapter 272 is hereby repealed.

That section reads as follows:

Section 34. Whoever commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with a beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than twenty years.

Get it? He wants that part repealed. As I said in the comment thread, Since Roe v. Wade, I never underestimate the darkness of man's heart.

Nor do I underestimate the stupid reasons one might have for wanting to repeal such a law, which I am sure, has nothing to do with his love of animals.

via LST

Open Thread.

You can discuss anything you wish, but take a minute and answer some questions for me. You don't have to leave a screenname.

1) How would you describe your political views? (conservative, liberal, libertarian, socialistic, ect.)

2) Are you male or female? Age?

3) Why do you read this blog?

4) What are 3 other blogs you read regularly?

5) What is your profession?

6) Married or single? Children?

7) What issue do you wish I would post more about?

8) What state or country do you live in?

9) What do you like best about this blog?

10) What do you like least?

I just want to get an idea of what some of my readers are like. Thanks!!!!

Asleep at the wheel.

I see some people are making fun of Ruth Bader Ginsburg for falling asleep (head on table I understand) during oral arguments yesterday. I know it's easy to make fun of, but come on. She is elderly and she has recovered from cancer. Just because you are a Supreme Court judge doesn't mean you are invincible. Give her a break already.

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Katrina is not over yet.

All I have been hearing on the news today is how President Bush said "No one could have anticipated the breach of the levees." And then clip showing someone advising Bush that the levees might overflow. (this is mentioned in the story below)

Will this part of the story get as much attention?:

"In the hectic, confused hours after Hurricane Katrina lashed the Gulf Coast, Louisiana's governor hesitantly but mistakenly assured the Bush administration that New Orleans' protective levees were intact, according to new video obtained by The Associated Press showing briefings that day with federal officials."

I don't mean to harp on the media this week, it just seems all these stories keep coming up. First of all overflow of the leeves is MUCH different than a breach. Second of all I would think that if I were President and the Governor assured me that there was no breach and she was there and the leader in charge, I would trust her too.

That has always been Bush's problem. Everytime he trusts a Democrat, it backfires on him.

I keep hearing that Bush wasn't engaged, didn't care about the people in New Orleans. Then when video surfaces that shows Bush was asking the right questions they say he knew but didn't do enough. You can't have it both ways guys.

I want a full investigation. I want to know the timeline of when people knew, what they said and how it all happened. I am tired of the hype and the spin. If we don't get this whole thing out in the open fully then Democrats will use this forever against Republicans. Truth be damned.

Update: The Captain fully explains this media hack job.

Have you seen this?????

David Gregory (the white house reporter that was so rude during the Cheney/shooting incident) calls the Imus show this morning from India DRUNK!!!!

Here's the audio.

Bad reporting continued.

Powerline has this:

"...how much of that controversy (Dubai Ports) was due to lousy reporting?Two items from today's news raise that question. The first is a correction in the New York Times:

Two articles on Saturday about the management deal for six American ports and its political fallout referred incorrectly to the role to be played by Dubai Ports World. It would run some of the terminal operations; it would not own the ports or take over all operations.

How is it possible for reporters to make such an elementary mistake about the central fact on which they were reporting? At a newspaper that put priority on getting the facts straight, not advancing the interests of the Democratic Party, such reporters wouldn't have jobs. But the Times was only one of many newspapers that misreported the facts of the ports transaction."

The Fourth Rail tells us about an important arrest and how it was reported:

"Abdur Rahman, one of the original signatories of Osama bin Laden’s 1998 fatwa declaring war against the West, is arrested; CNN obscures his ties to al-Qaeda

CNN irresponsibly obscures Rahman’s ties to al-Qaeda, “According to the security official, Bangladeshi security forces have been searching for Rahman since August and believe that he has ties with al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.” The fact is Rahman is intricately tied to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, as reported here last January; “Abdur Rahman is not your run-of-the-mill local Islamist terrorist leader. Rahman is one of the select signatories to the 1998 fatwa that created the International Islamic Front, the umbrella group of Islamist terrorist groups that declared war on the West. The signatories include: Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri [amir of the Jihad Group in Egypt and second in command of al-Qaeda], Abu-Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha [amir of the Egyptian Islamic Group] and Mir Hamzah [secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Pakistan].”

Notice the "believe" that he has "ties." Downplay what is really great news on the war on terror with word play. This is what has been happening. Word play. Why does it always have to be against us? Is there really a hidden agenda or is it just plain lousy reporting?

This what you call a must read.

NRO directed me here. Just read it. It isn't about politics. It's about life.

It's good, really really good.

Read it and let's talk about it.

More on Ports deal.

As Jill pointed out Bill Clinton helped on ports deal while Hillary was opposing it.

What does Bill have to do with Hillary?

Oh yeah. They are "married."

Btw, it was a done deal before the controversy interrupted.

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

The last breath of the press.

Ralph Peters of The New York Post in Iraq: (emphasis mine)

"The reporting out of Baghdad continues to be hysterical and dishonest. There is no civil war in the streets. None. Period.

Terrorism, yes. Civil war, no. Clear enough?


Yesterday, I crisscrossed Baghdad, visiting communities on both banks of the Tigris and logging at least 25 miles on the streets. With the weekend curfew lifted, I saw traffic jams, booming business and everyday life in abundance.

Yes, there were bombings yesterday. The terrorists won't give up on their dream of sectional strife, and know they can count on allies in the media as long as they keep the images of carnage coming. They'll keep on bombing. But Baghdad isn't London during the Blitz, and certainly not New York on 9/11.<...>You are being lied to. By elements in the media determined that Iraq must fail."


You want more from Iraq? IraqPundit has this:(emphasis mine)

"Why do these reporters want to see a civil war so badly in Iraq? It looks to me that they hate Bush so much that they will stop at nothing to prove that he's wrong about Iraq and they are right. The reporters have sunk so low as to take this cheap angle of insisting that an all out civil war has been underway for three years. When will they wake up and realize that this is not a White House scandal. This is about Iraq and its people. Yes some people are being aggressive and I pray that the violence doesn't spread. But why do the media report exaggerated numbers of attacks and damage when it can only make a bad situation worse. What ever happened to checking for accuracy? Iraq the Model posted a list of numbers of what really was damaged.

The thugs of Moktada Al Sadr were responsible for most of the attacks. And the Interior Ministry's death squads were sent out by Bayan Jabr Solagh, who headed the Badr Brigades. IraqPundit is under no illusion that things are good right now. However, there is no reason to take the tabloid angle and declare a civil war when the parties who would fight that war have not yet declared one. The media appear to prefer to go for the schock approach instead of a responsible one."


Speaking of accuracy:

"Iraq's Cabinet, meanwhile, disputes a Washington Post tally of 13-hundred Iraqi dead in the past week, calling that number "inaccurate and exaggerated."

The Post cited figures from the Baghdad central morgue in its report on deaths in the violence since a Shiite shrine was destroyed. But a morgue official says as of Sunday night it had only received 249 bodies tied to the violence."


Via Mudville

I cannot wrap my mind around the clear evidence that there is reporting going on that is DETERMINED to paint President Bush and American soldiers in a bad light for what seems to be one reason and one reason only...to make sure Bush is not proven right.

Is there no honor in the journalism profession at all? No honesty??

I have read, not one, not two, but several opinion pieces in the last few days from respected intelligent people who are either in or just returned from Iraq. What they are saying is very different from what the msm is reporting and very different from what the milblogs are saying.

What the hell is going on here???? Whether you agree with the war or not, I don't think any of us want it sabotaged in the press. We want the truth, don't we????

We deserve better. I don't know how, but we have got to start demanding accurate reporting regarding the war. The press is only shooting itself in the foot here. The more people distrust the msm, the more they will turn to the internet for news and information.

The way I see it, the biggest casualty of this war may be the press itself.

Who Runs A Cargo Terminal At JFK Airport?

You guessed it!

The United Arab Emirates.

Blogs For Bush wants to know where is Schumer's outrage?

The dueling polls.

Smash doesn't think much of this new poll saying the troops want out of Iraq:

"I CAN'T SPEAK for anyone else, but I know that if a pollster came up to me while I was serving in uniform, and asked if I'd like to participate in an opinion poll, he'd get a two-word answer from me.

The second word would be "OFF."

But that's exactly what John Zogby's polling firm claims to have done with 944 soldiers serving in Iraq. Nothing like this has ever been attemted before. The
results are interesting, but somewhat self-contradictory, and therefore difficult to analyze.

The poll, conducted in conjunction with Le Moyne College’s Center for Peace and Global Studies, showed that 29% of the respondents, serving in various branches of the armed forces, said the U.S. should leave Iraq “immediately,” while another 22% said they should leave in the next six months. Another 21% said troops should be out between six and 12 months, while 23% said they should stay “as long as they are needed.”

What I'd like to know, is what was the ratio of those refusing to take part in the poll to those agreeing to participate? Now that's a number from which I could draw some interesting analysis..."


Smash might be interested in this poll:

"Majority of US Troops Favor Increased Troop Levels in Iraq"

What???

As Blogs for Bush points out:

"Jason over at Generation Why ponied up the $19.99 to become a premium member of Zogby's site and found in that poll some interesting things that the New York Times didn't see fit to print. Things like this:

A majority of troops (53%) said the U.S. should double both the number of troops and bombing missions in order to control the insurgency.


Sounds to me like the troops want to win this thing - pull out, sure; but only after victory is secured. Addtionally, nearly 37% of the troops view calls here at home for a quick withdrawal as unpatriotic - so, it isn't just armchair warriors starting to question the patriotism of the war critics, but the front line warriors as well."

This is why I hate polls. One can always find a way to get the results they wish. Or...print the results they wish. Whichever.

How quickly a story changes.

And how disappointing it obviously is to the reporter.

Mudville has this:

"On February 24, as U.S. media hysteria reached it's peak in the wake of the shrine bombing in Iraq, the New York Times declared in a banner headline that More Clashes Shake Iraq; Political Talks Are in Ruins. Not jeopardized, not threatened, but ruined. All hopes dashed, over, fini, kaput. Stick a fork in it. The Iraqi Consensus Front, a key Sunni Arab political bloc, had pulled out of talks to form a government with the Shiite and Kurdish parties. According to the Times, civil war was looming - perhaps had even begun.


It had to be painful for the same reporter to file this story with the Times 48 hours later

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Feb. 26 — Leaders of the main Sunni Arab political bloc have decided to return to suspended talks over the formation of a new government, the top Sunni negotiator said Sunday. The step could help defuse the sectarian tensions that threatened to spiral into open civil war last week after the bombing of a Shiite shrine and the killings of Sunnis in reprisal.

Could defuse the tensions. Maybe. Possibly. Might. Because, it's not that big a deal, I guess.

Same reporter for both stories, by the way. Ed Wong - the Times has been passing off his deeply flawed analysis as actual news for quite some time."

A little history of Ash Wednesday.

Ashes are an ancient symbol of penance predating Christianity. They remind us of our mortality. We come from dust and unto dust we shall return.

They are made from the burned palms of last year. Placing ashes on the head was an ancient penitential custom, as is evident in the Bible (e.g. Jonas 3:5-9)

From about the fifth century, sinners confessed their sins on Ash Wednesday. They did not receive absolution but were enrolled in the "order of penitents," signified by placing ashes in the form of a cross on their foreheads. They were then assigned public penance to be performed throughout Lent and on Holy Thursday morning they received absolution.

2005 Lenten Booklet

Catholic City.

Very Interesting:

"A FORMER marine who was raised by nuns and made a fortune selling pizza has embarked on a 230m plan to build the first town in America to be run according to strict Catholic principles.
Abortions, pornography and contraceptives will be banned in the new Florida town of Ave Maria, which has begun to take shape on former vegetable farms 90 miles northwest of Miami.

Tom Monaghan, the founder of the Domino's Pizza chain, has stirred protests from civil rights activists by declaring that Ave Maria's pharmacies will not be allowed to sell condoms or birth control pills. The town's cable television network will carry no X-rated channels.
The town will be centered around a 100ft tall oratory and the first Catholic university to be built in America for 40 years. The university's president, Nicholas J Healy, has said future students should help rebuild "the city of God" in a country suffering from a "catastrophic cultural collapse."

My first thought when reading this is that it would be difficult to "spread the gospel" as we are called to do in our Christian lives, if we separate ourselves from society.

My second thought was that I would like to live there.

Let's face it, there are so many of us who want to live in a society free from abortion, porn, and an educational system that teaches our children the exact opposite of our values. I want to live in that society. I see nothing wrong with people freely choosing to do so either. But I also feel that those that do must also not isolate themselves and must also give back to the society at large.

I think people like Monaghan probably tire of fighting the immoral values of this world. The main problem I have with our society is that even the most diligent of parents are unable to protect their children from things they are too young to be exposed to and no one really seems to care about that. Everyone cares more about their own desires.

Something like this really underscores how immoral our society has become that people feel forced to pull away from it in such a dramatic way. I know I feel defeated all the time.

This should be an interesting experiment. I have a feeling there will be more people wanting to live there than even Monaghan imagines. I still am uncomfortable with the separation thing, but I understand why he feels a need to do this. I would imagine that liberals would rather something like this be built than for Monaghan to use his money to fight against them in politics, right?

Somehow, I don't think that will be the case.

via Kyrie

Let's see some outrage.

Iraq The Model brings what we may have missed otherwise regarding Saddam's trial:

"The documents revealed some unbelievably terrifying facts about the Dujail massacre; can you imagine that when orders were given to execute the 148 "convicts" the prison authorities executed only 96 of them. Why?Because the remaining 48 "convicts" had already passed away during "interrogation"!! What kind of interrogation was that killed one third of the suspects?!"

How many times have I listened to those here rant about Abu Ghraib? Even though we properly took care of the barbarians that committed those acts (and no one was killed thank God) and everyone condemned it, they rant and rant about how terrible we are.

Let's see if we see the rants about this. You hate the idea of torture? Meet the king of torture. Because, you know, torture that ends with one's death is the REALLY bad kind.

Oh, and one more thing.

He can't do it anymore.

via NRO

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

A Blogger Party!


Friday night the bloggers and commenters of Lone Star Times (which I link often) met for a few drinks and chat. I really enjoy meeting other bloggers and those interested in politics. The Lone Star Times is more about local stuff and local politics. Super nice people!!!

You can't really blame them...



One of the floats at New Orlean's Mardi Gras. Heh.

The War You Didn't See.

Read this excellent article that really goes to the heart of why I blog on the good news from Iraq. The press goes with a story that sells, one that sounds the worst that it can, but doesn't tell the whole story.

Remember the first national guard unit out of California to go to Iraq in 2004? The gentleman who wrote the article linked here was in that unit, the 1st of the 184th Infantry Regiment. This may jog your memory:

"From the first weeks of our mobilization in August 2004, we were in the spotlight. We were the battalion "mired in scandal." We were, according to the disgruntled, poor in training and morale. Once in Iraq, we were the battalion that suffered casualties seemingly faster than anyone could count: 17 killed in action and nearly 100 wounded in 12 months. We were the battalion whose commander, Col. William W. Wood, became the highest-ranking soldier to die in action. Our previous commander was relieved of duty after a scandal involving the abuse of Iraqi prisoners. Even as we rolled out each day to confront terrorists, we were known at home primarily for things that had nothing to do with the job we did or how we did it."

And they did their job well. He goes on: (emphasis mine)

"Google us to find the litany of supposed woe. But if you want to know the real story of our battalion, go find Sgt. Thomas Kruger and ask him about April 5, 2005.

On that bright spring morning, with his legs shattered, Kruger dragged himself across 100 feet of debris and shrapnel to reach Cpl. Glenn Watkins, who had been mortally wounded moments earlier by the same ghastly roadside bomb.

You might also ask anyone from our ranks about Staff Sgt. Steve Nunez. Broken and bloodied by an IED, he was ordered home to recuperate after refusing to go voluntarily. He rejoined us to carry the fight forward, refusing the chance to stay home.

There were no front-page headlines for Kruger, Nunez or even Sgt. 1st Class Tom Stone, who covered a wounded subordinate's body with his own to protect that soldier from a secondary attack that could have come at any moment.

Stone, a Los Angeles Police Department officer, and Kruger, a paramedic on movie sets, were awarded Bronze Stars for their valor. Nunez, a Riverside metalworker, received our awe and admiration, and I hope yours too.

Equally deserving of recognition were Sgt. 1st Class Chris Chebatah and 1st Lt. Ky Cheng. One terrible September night, an armored personnel carrier in their patrol was destroyed by a tremendous blast and flipped, pinning a soldier. Even while taking enemy fire and directing the care for casualties around them, they rigged a chain to pull the 10-ton vehicle off him. The effort was successful but ultimately futile.

So far, 14 of our soldiers have been decorated for valor and another 48 have earned the Bronze Star for service. But that cannot be found in print."

Regarding the investigation of abuse of detainees:

"What was not said was that it was one of the soldiers in our own battalion who had found the video of the abuse and turned it in to our commander."

He ends with this:

"When it comes to Iraq, in my experience, that constituency is poorly served."

So true.

In other words, the story of the abuse of detainees was so juicy that it colored everything about the Regiment, even though these soldiers themselves turned in evidence as soon as they discovered it. Only 3 soldiers were sent to prison for the abuse. A disgrace that, as usual, was taken care of by our military. The heroic deeds of the rest of the Regiment ignored by the media. As the author points out, "The facts did not live up to the hype, but the hype was what we, and you, were left with."

In this wonderful age of the internet, we don't have to be left with just the hype. Now we can spread the truth with the "big picture" without it being censored by reporters with political agendas or those more interested in a dark juicy story than the whole truth.

Our soldiers deserve more than the press is giving them. If their stories are going to be told, then they deserve they be told with honesty.

It is the least we can do.

Friends.

Richard Cohen of the New York Dail News puts the Port controversy in perspective:

"To overlook the xenophobic element in this controversy is to overlook the obvious. It is what propelled the squabble and what sustains it. Bush put his finger on it right away. "What I find interesting is that it's okay for a British company to manage some ports, but not okay for a company from a country that is a valuable ally in the war on terror," he said last week. "The UAE has been a valuable partner in fighting the war on terror." It is a long way from a terrorist haven.

Somewhere in the White House, a political operative must have slapped his head in consternation as Bush made that remark. The politic thing for a President with a dismal approval rating (about 40%) would have been to join with the critics, get ahead of the anti-Arab wave and announce that he, too, was concerned about the deal. Instead, the White House stuck to its guns."


Once again Bush goes against what would be a political move to be liked (which would be so easy) and goes with what he knows is right. It's the mark of a great leader in my opinion.

Cohen ends with this:

"Maybe because Bush is a Bush - son of a President who got to know many Arabs - or maybe because he just naturally recoils from prejudice, his initial stance on this controversy has been refreshingly admirable. Whatever the case, the President has done the right thing."

One has to admit that many people in this country don't want to have anything to do with anyone in the Middle East. On the one hand they want democracy to flourish there, but on the other they want it all and everyone who is Middle Eastern to stay there.

This is a global economy. We cannot isolate ourselves as much as we would like to. We have to be able to distinguish between who are our friends and who are our enemies. If you think that every Arab is our enemy, then you are wrong.

Our future will include relations with Arab nations in a way that has not been seen before. The world is changing. We are changing it. We are now a part of the Middle East and they are a part of us.

Bush understands this. It's time we all did.

Monday, February 27, 2006

There is no media bias.

Nope. Not here. No way. I mean, come on...PROVE IT.

The Iraq story the msm misses.

If you can take one more positive look at Iraq. Here it is.

Victor Davis Hanson reminds us of what we thought was impossible and what might still be possible:

It was nearly an impossible task to remove Saddam Hussein, foster democracy in the heart of the ancient caliphate and restore on a relatively short timetable what took the Husseins three decades to destroy. Meanwhile, all this must be done surrounded by Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia; in the midst of a larger war against Islamic fundamentalism; and while under global scrutiny from a largely hostile audience.Yet what amazes is not so much the audacity of even thinking the United States could attempt such a thing, but rather that it may just pull it off after all — if only we remain patient.

H/T BigDog

Shame on the Red Cross.

The Captain has this:

The Red Cross has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on promotion of its executives in the media and on celebrity parties instead of assistance to disaster victims, the Washington Post reports today:
The American Red Cross paid consultants more than $500,000 in the past three years to pitch its name in Hollywood, recruit stars for its "Celebrity Cabinet" and brand its chief executive as the face of the Red Cross -- just a year before ousting her, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.



I know the Red Cross does invaluable work, but it's reasons like this my money always goes to Catholic Charities. It's a matter of trust.

Say What????

WSJ has this:

Jihadi Turns Bulldog

The Taliban's former spokesman is now a Yale student. Anyone see a problem with that?

Monday, February 27, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST

Never has an article made me blink with astonishment as much as when I read in yesterday's New York Times magazine that Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi, former ambassador-at-large for the Taliban, is now studying at Yale on a U.S. student visa.


read the whole thing.

It's like stepping through the looking glass. Hello. Let's wake up people.

Color me unimpressed.

I know this is kind of like bashing the student body President in highschool, but I saw Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit.com) for the first time on Q&A on Cspan last night and I want to know who thinks this guy is conservative? Not only is he not conservative, he comes across as pompous and elite as any mainstream media figure out there.

He said he worked on the Gore campaign in '88 and again in "92, so where does he get the reputation of being on the right? From what I see he doesn't even really blog. He links. How is he different from Drudge?

Heaven forbid a lowly blogger such as myself should criticize Glenn, who gets on average a thousand e-mails a day, so he doesn't even have to look for his links. They are sent to him. But it seems to me that he was just lucky enough and smart enough to be in on the beginning of blogging and understood that most people just wanted links to the best stories of the day.

That is a nice service to provide, no doubt, but in my opinion, it isn't blogging.

Could Ted Rall be any more of an idiot?

Apparently so.

I have to add Darleen's parody, because Ted so deserves it.

Sometimes I can't believe what I read.

Redstate has this:


New York Times Warns Foreign Leaders: Do Not Help the U.S.

By: Nick Danger · Section: News

In a startling breach of international etiquette, the New York Times today warned foreign intelligence services not to assist the United States. The warning was backed by public disclosure of highly secretive assistance provided to the U.S. military on the eve of the Iraq War.
"German intelligence services helped the United States invade Baghdad, and will now pay the price," the Times effectively told intelligence services worldwide. As it has in the past, the Times published classified information to bolster its latest attack on U.S. interests.
Foreign intelligence services are now on notice that the so-called "newspaper of record" intends to publicize their interactions with counterparts in the United States, despite any assurances of secrecy.


Read the whole thing. Good Lord.

Sunday, February 26, 2006

Unfit to Print??

Powerline has this:

The New York Post devotes an editorial to underreported news including the letter of thanks to the men and women of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment from the mayor of Tall Afar: "Unfit to print?" The Post writes:

Every newspaper in the country should have run Mayor Najim Abdullah Abid Al-Jibouri's tribute to U.S. troops.

It's legitimate news — offering detailed updates on Iraq's reconstruction from the perspective of Iraqis.

And it's positive news.

The mayor wrote: "Our city was the main base of operations for Abu Mousab Al Zarqawi. Our streets were silent, and no one dared to walk them...Terrorists occupied and controlled the only hospital in the city.

"Their savagery reached such a level that they stuffed the corpses of children with explosives and tossed them into the streets in order to kill grieving parents attempting to retrieve the bodies of their young.

"This was the situation of our city until God prepared and delivered unto them the courageous soldiers of the 3d Armored Cavalry Regiment, who liberated this city, ridding it of Zarqawi's followers after harsh fighting, killing many terrorists, and forcing the remaining butchers to flee the city like rats."

The letter has, as The Post reported last Monday, created a swell of pride in American servicemen.

Military families, fed up with conventional reporting, spread this and other positive stories through e-mail and Web sites. The letter itself was distributed to the families of the 3rd Cavalry Regiment in Fort Carson, Colo., upon the soldiers' return from their second year-long Iraq tour.

"Officers and soldiers alike bristle with the confidence and character of knights in a bygone era," the mayor writes. "The mission . . . deserves to be studied in military science. This military operation was clean, with little collateral damage, despite the ferocity of the enemy. With the skill and precision of surgeons they dealt with the terrorist cancers in the city without causing unnecessary damage."

Inspiring stuff. So shouldn't Americans hear about it?

Don't the troops deserve to?

As traditional news outlets consider how to compete with Internet-driven media into the future, they might consider why it is Americans have to turn to blogs and e-mail to learn about what our troops are accomplishing.

Across Iraq, as Iraqis and Americans together build bulwarks against jihadi violence, their stories are lost to al Qaeda's bombs, which are endlessly rebroadcast around the world.

If the good guys could count on the same kind of press, the long road toward a stable Iraqi nation might seem not quite so arduous.

I posted on this two weeks ago. I, like others on the web weren't sure it was legitimate. We thought that if it was then surely the MSM would have reported on it with great intensity. I mean, this is the mayor of Baghdad, and it does help us to remember why we are there. But since it wasn't reported much we wondered.

It shouldn't have surprised us. A commenter here thinks that there is no one that really doesn't want us to succeed in Iraq. Then how does one explain this?