Saturday, June 06, 2009

"U.S. Lawyers Agreed on Legality of Harsh Interrogations"

You know it had to hurt for the New York Times to actually type that headline. I have argued until I'm blue in the face with liberals on my Chron blog that just because you believe it's torture doesn't mean that LEGALLY it was torture. Which is why Obama couldn't go after the ones who participated in it in the CIA. He knew he would lose.

It was all legal folks, like it or not.

via HotAir

*It seems the NYT has changed it's headlines to inclue "brutal." It's strange how they are always doing that after publication with no note that it was done or why.