There is nothing more I enjoy than seeing Hollywood trying to jam propaganda down down our throats, and then lose their shirts on anti-Iraq war movies.
Andrew Breitbart says it perfectly:
This was the year Hollywood finally realized that it couldn't sell an anti-Iraq war film. It also was the year the mainstream media discovered it couldn't report that the war on terror had failed.
Countless prime-time hours and untold acres of celluloid and newsprint were wasted demeaning the American mission. Yet, in the end, the heroic warriors destroyed their media adversaries by defeating our true enemies on the battlefield.
Except for the election of an antiwar candidate, 2008 was a great year for the pro-war side and only an economic meltdown could divert attention from this fact.
And even President-elect Barack Obama seems poised to disappoint the zealous anti-warriors who flamed his candidacy. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates could not have been the "change" Moveon.org believed in, just as soon-to-be Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton - who voted to authorize the Iraq war - isn't likely what filmmaker Michael Moore had in mind.
Obama has said that we will re-focus our commitment to Afghanistan, bolstering our troops to defeat the Taliban there.
Will this be a war the Democrats can get behind? Will Hollywood make pro-Afghanistan movies?
Don't count on it. But I do have a feeling they will be very very quiet about the whole thing.
Monday, December 29, 2008
Will Hollywood become pro-war?
Posted by RightwingSparkle at 6:53 PM
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|