My oldest are home from college. It's family time. I probably won't be posting this weekend unless something dramatic happens.

I wish all of you the blessings of Easter.

Losing the Hispanic Vote

The controversial issue of illegal immigration will raise it's ugly head again when the so called "DREAM Act" will come to the floor. A few days ago Sen. Dick Durbin and other members of congress introduced a new version of the DREAM Act, that would allow illegal alien teens that were brought here by their parents as toddlers or babies to remain in the country if they attend college or join the military.

The Democrats would like nothing better than to bestow citizenship to all 12 million illegal aliens in this country right now so that they can secure those votes for the future. This bill is a small door opened for that idea.

This is what Republicans get for being so stubborn on this issue.

When Pres. Bush pushed for comprehensive immigration reform, the Republicans wouldn't budge.

Bush had called for strengthening security along the U.S.-Mexico border, including a 50 percent increase in the number of Border Patrol agents, but he also called for a guest-worker program, which would allow foreign workers to fill jobs in the United States for a limited time, after which they would return home and allowing some of the more than 12 million illegal immigrants already in the United States to work their way toward citizenship, by paying fines and back taxes, working in a job "for a number of years" and learning English.

But no, heaven forbid we do ANYTHING but deport them all.

When the Democrat majority in Congress and Pres. Obama get through, you guys who were all against Bush on this will be BEGGING for that kind of compromise.

If you remember, amendments on Bush's bill that would have required adult illegal immigrants to return to their home country within 2 yrs in order to apply for a new type of visa that would allow them to stay in the U.S. indefinitely were also defeated. It seemed no compromise was good enough for Republicans.

So Republicans looked anti-Hispanic to the fastest growing minority in this country. Just great. And then we wonder why Obama got the majority of the Hispanic vote?

Fast forward to the Obama administration, who will do everything in it's power to make illegal aliens legal and there won't be any of this going back to their home country, paying fines, or back taxes, or probably even learning english.

With this sweet sounding "Dream Act" millions of young Hispanic adults will become American citizens just in time to VOTE. And they will be forever grateful to the Democrats for the privilege. They will soon have families and they also will vote Democrat.

Do you see why this is so frustrating for me? For years on this blog I have tried to get my Republican friends to look past their own stubbornness on this issue and compromise in a way that would bring more Hispanics into our party. Hispanics are a natural fit. They are pro-family, pro-life, religious, and value oriented. The rhetoric coming out of the Republican party on this issue has alienated this community of legal citizen voters.

Now, because we wouldn't compromise with Pres. Bush, we not only will get "Amnesty" for illegal aliens, but generations of Hispanics beholden to Democrats for their citizenship.

The U.S. Delegation of the Crazy to Cuba

I'll never understand as long as I live why so many on the left refuse to acknowledge the human right abuses in Cuba. Take a look at these astonishingly stupid remarks by Rep. Emanuel after visiting Cuba:

[U.S. Rep. Emanuel] Cleaver called his trip the most interesting he had ever taken. He said he preached Sunday at an Episcopal church where he was allowed to speak freely and meet privately with congregation members. An interpreter was at Cleaver’s side throughout his trip.

“To see all of these myths melt right in front of my eyes was something to behold,” he said. “We’ve been led to believe that the Cuban people are not free, and they are repressed by a vicious dictator, and I saw nothing to match what we’ve been told.”

Really? All those repressed in Cuba by a vicious dictator is just a myth? So... people climb on rickety rafts and tires with their children and risk death (and many die) to make it 228 miles to Miami just for fun?

What planet does this man live on? People who have survived to tell about Cuba here describe post revolution firing squads. Execution without trial. Gross human right violations, on children as well as adults. There are hundreds of political prisoners languishing in Cuban prisons as we speak.

Does this delegation, which was headed by Rep. Barbara Lee of California accompanied by Rep. Cleaver, Reps. Marcia Fudge of Ohio, Mel Watt of North Carolina, Bobby Rush of Illinois and Mike Honda and Laura Richardson, both of California, HONESTLY believe that the Cubans living here in the United States are lying about these abuses? What do they imagine that the people who risk an agonizing death at sea to get here are running from?

It boggles the mind that these people are actually elected officials.

After this embarrassing trip, Fidel Castro released a statement where he noted that members of the delegation said that American society “continues to be racist” despite President Obama’s election. When asked about this on the news this evening the delegation insisted that they said nothing of the kind.

What? Fidel is lying?

Imagine that (although something tells me that he wasn't lying in this instance).

Fidel also said that one "lawmaker" expressed that the United States "should apologize to Cuba for all these years of hostility and for the blockade policy..."

You can read Fidel's entire statement here where he paints the picture of a lovely Cuba where there are no "illiterate people or children shining shoes on the streets." Where all young people attend school and universities. Where all people enjoy free day-care-centers, free senior citizens homes, free hospitals and "no citizens queuing up to apply for a job."

What a paradise! Yet, there is that pesky rickety raft thing. I mean, if all that is true, then why, WHY in the world would Cubans risk their very own lives to leave such a Utopia?

They would have to be crazy, right? No. Who is crazy are the Representatives listed above who dismiss all those brave Cubans who risked everything they loved to come to the United States because of a brutal Communist evil dictator.

As Sen. Mel Martinez, a Florida Republican says, “This is the time to support pro-democracy activists in Cuba, not provide the Castro regime with a resource windfall.”

Castro,

Free political prisoners. Let your people travel freely, let them speak freely, let Cubans living here visit family without reprisals, let people leave Cuba if they wish.

Try all that FIRST, then we can "open a dialogue" with you.

For more about all things Cuba, visit the most excellent blog Babalu.

Good grief

I wasn't going to blog about Pres. Obama bowing to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. I didn't even watch the video of it. It seemed silly. It may be irritating, but we have more things to worry about. But now the Obama administration is denying that it was a bow. So I finally look at the video and it is CLEARLY a bow. Give me a break. If he bowed, he bowed. Just own it. Don't lie when it's on video tape for heaven's sake.

Unacceptable

Pres. Obama goes out on a limb for Turkey and what kind of thanks does he get? Turkey TV mocking him in blackface.

Now, I know the left in this country never defended Bush when anyone in or outside our borders mocked him. They were too busy mocking him themselves. We may disagree with Obama on issues, policy, and big government, but the color of his skin has nothing to do with those things and this "blackface" is unacceptable. We should all be offended, whether we agree with Obama or not, he is our President and I won't stand by and say nothing while this kind of vile racism occurs like the left did when Bush was mocked.

Turkey should be ashamed.

A Rock Star, Not a Leader

I know I haven't been blogging about all the "gaffes" of Obama overseas. Yes, it is tempting to write about how the press would have reacted if Bush had thought "Austrian" was a language, but didn't we hate that? It was so ridiculous to go over and over the mistakes and gaffes like they did with Pres. Bush.

I know the feeling is that turnabout is fair play, but I just can't get into it.

My overall feeling of the G-20 summit and the NATO conference was just frustration. I don't like to see my President whine. I don't like to hear him call America "arrogant" and "derisive," because I don't believe we are. I don't like hearing him say "we may not always have the best answer," because I believe we do.

What Reagan always understood was that one negotiates from a position of strength. Obama seems to negotiate from a position of regret. It's not leadership stuff. It just isn't. He talked more about "listening" than leading. The latter should have come first.

This whole overseas trip really was only about one thing...Obama The Rock Star. It was about Obama showing the world that America really isn't that bad.

Ugh.

In reality, other than his pretty speeches, Obama didn't achieve much. Not that you would notice that, with the press rolling around at his feet like a puppy dog waiting for a snack.

Pres. Obama asked for an increase in global stimulus efforts, but simply nothing came of that. He had hoped to get a bit of help in Afghanistan and that was pretty much ignored. And lastly, and most embarrassingly, just as Obama's soaring rhetoric was pleading for a world without nuclear arms, N. Korea fires a long range missile as a nice backdrop for that pretty speech. Later Obama would say, ""North Korea broke the rules, once again, by testing a rocket that could be used for long-range missiles." Broke the rules? Like it was a school child that wrote on the bathroom walls. Good grief. We can't even get strong language here, much less a strong reaction.

Let me just say what no one else will say. Under Obama, the U.S. nor the U.N. are going to do a dang thing to N. Korea until a missile hits a city, and we all know that and N. Korea knows that too. Same thing with Iran.



The Rock Star returns to the United States, still a rock star, but not a leader.

Oh, but didn't Michelle look fabulous? *eye roll*

Ted Nugent prays for Obama to fail...

Yeah, I agree.

But I will let the rock and roller explain.

The One True Journalist

Jake Tapper of ABC News twitters and I follow him. I follow news guys for tips for stories for blogging and breaking news, but Jake twitters like a crazy person sometimes and you gotta love that.

But what is even better to love is that he actually asks tough questions of Pres. Obama instead of just staring and drooling like the rest of the White House Press corps.

Don't get the wrong idea. Tapper is decidedly liberal. That is clear in his tweets too. But the difference is that Tapper is actually a rare thing these days. A real journalist with real integrity in his work. He doesn't let his liberal views keep him from being fair or asking the tough questions.

For crazy, here are just a few of his recent tweets while following around the Pres. in Europe:

re: snacks on plane - reporters descended like locusts upon trays of hummus and dolmades. skeleton found in wake-

the truth is i cant get "elmo has two hands" out of my head. during the campaign it was "bob the builder" theme song

Dude Looks Like a LAAYYY-DEEEEE!!!

hey, annoying person on bus, can u solicit the bus driver to get on the PA and be annoying too? u already did! thanks

DUDES POTUS just called on the China TV guy!!!!


National Review has a piece about him and it quotes Rush Limbaugh as saying, “Jake Tapper is the one guy outside the butt-boy bubble in the White House press room.”

Very true.

NR says this:

What we can say for certain is that Tapper isn’t afraid to go against the grain of the liberal consensus in pursuit of a story. Whether he was pointing out that Barack Obama was a “one-man gaffe machine,” factchecking Obama on the surge, or chiding him for blaming any and all mistakes on his staff, no mainstream journalist was tougher on Obama during the campaign. Considering the fact that much of the media gave Obama the kid-glove treatment, Tapper’s reporting was essential.

Conservatives never minded journalists being liberal. We just wanted their journalistic integrity to give us the news fair and balanced. But that has evaporated completely with few exceptions, and Jake Tapper is one of them.

Why The Government Never Shrinks

Sen. DeMint has a great piece at the American Spectator about the politics of earmarks. This is at the heart of spending and part of what this tea party thing is about:

Take any bill in Congress that impinges on a sector of our economy or on individual liberty itself, and you will find it festooned with earmarks to assuage the concerns of congressmen and senators otherwise unwilling to accept the slow creep of collectivism.

If a proposed bill is 20 percent over budget and thus falls 10 votes shy of passage, congressional leaders are faced with a choice. On one hand, they can cut the bill’s spending by 20 percent. On the other hand, they can increase spending by another percentage point or two to specifically fund projects in the home districts of those 10 recalcitrant members. If they cut spending, the leaders would risk alienating members already comfortable with the size of the bill. If they increase spending with a few earmarks, the only people who will be upset are cranky skin-flints (like me) who were probably voting against the thing anyway.

Which tactic do you think Republican and Democrat leaders tend to employ? There is a reason bipartisan compromises never seem to shrink government. Advocates of earmarks say they represent a fraction of the cost of underlying bills. But like crack cocaine, earmarks create problems disproportionate to their size.

Some love to argue that this spending "creates jobs." But that simply isn't true:

The great lie at the heart of earmarking is that the projects funded create jobs at all. Take the $1.8 million earmark just passed—as part of a $410 billion spending bill—that funds research into pig odor (no, seriously). Its author argues that the study will, in fact, create jobs for the researchers conducting the project. But the problem is that $1.8 million will have to be first taxed out of the economy before it is redirected to any pig farms.

That $1.8 million, if left in the hands of the businesses and families who earned it, could build new homes for several young families, create dozens of jobs for small businesses, or develop new products and services for innovative entrepreneurs to market. In Washington, politicians talk as if federal money is free—it just appears, like magic. But of course, federal spending must come from somewhere in the private sector. Every job the government "creates" is funded through the elimination of a job (or two) in the private sector.

This is why the spending will never work:

That's why the biggest threat to our economy is not corporate greed—which is restrained by both law enforcement and market competition—but political greed, which is encouraged and even rewarded by our political system. Thus Americans are told that the only thing that can save us is a $1 trillion government spending "stimulus" bill that the Congressional Budget Office reports will be a long-term detriment to our economy. Meanwhile, the policies hidden behind the price tag make us less free, less competitive, and more dependent on a federal bureaucracy only too eager to control more and more of the economy.

The media has been focused lately on the greed of AIG big wigs, but in reality their greed in NO WAY compares to the greed of our politicians. It's time we recognized that and did something about it.

Tea Party. Be there.

Consequences

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned this week that if N. Korea fired a long range missle "There will be consequences."



Well, N. Korea did last night.

Our President had this response:

"Now is the time for a strong international response, and North Korea must know that the path to security and respect will never come through threats and illegal weapons."

I just can't wait to see what the "consequences" will be.

The drunken sailors passed the budget last night.

The Democrat drunken sailors approved Pres. Obama’s new budget late last night. While you were probably sleeping, your little ones down the hall just took on a burden that Americans don't seem to be able to fully grasp.

The sailors approved the $3.5 trillion budget during a time of economic crisis not seen in decades.

Voting along party lines, the House and Senate approved budget blueprints that would trim Obama’s spending proposals for the fiscal year that begins in October and curtail his plans to cut taxes. The blueprints, however, would permit work to begin on the central goals of Obama’s presidency: an expansion of health-care coverage for the uninsured, more money for college loans and a cap-and-trade system to reduce gases that contribute to global warming.

What?? Curtail cutting taxes????! You mean that mantra during the campaign that 95% of get a tax cut was disingenuous? Said only to get elected? I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you.

When will people realized that a Democrat will NEVER EVER cut your taxes no matter what he says.

This budget didn't get ONE SINGLE GOP vote. Maybe this tea party thing is waking them up to the fact that we aren't going to put up with Republicans that say one thing and vote another. Even our usual betrayer, Susan Collins had this to say of why she would not vote for it:

Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican who sided with Obama on his $787 billion economic stimulus plan, said she couldn't support the White House plan this time.

"It would double the public debt in 5 years, triple it in 10 years. ... That is not sustainable. It poses a threat to the basic health of our economy," Collins said.

Even two Democrats stood strong against this wall of debt. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Evan Bayh (D-IN).

Sen. Judd Gregg, who has become the Senate's version of the Emergency Siren Warning System, had this to say:

"The practical implications of this is bankruptcy for the United States," said Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. "There's no other way around it. If we maintain the proposals which are in this budget over the 10-year period that this budget covers, this country will go bankrupt. People will not buy our debt; our dollar will become devalued."

But who really listens to that siren anyway?

Meanwhile unemployment crept up to 8.5% in March, according to numbers out this morning -- up from 8.1% last month, shedding another 663,000 jobs.

We can poke fun at Michelle Obama for touching the Queen, a protocol no no, get angry at Obama for bowing at King Abdullah, laugh at the Obama's tacky gifts, OR we can focus on what is really important here. An economic crisis that is only going to get worse under this budget.

I encourage you to find the closest tea party to you and bring your friends and attend on April 15th. This is just the beginning.

Our voices will be heard.

Some Brits not impressed with Obama

Oh, and it seems that PM Gordon Brown has a man crush on Obama despite his crappy gifts to him.

This is funny.

Anarchists suck and Capitalism doesn't

Here are some pics of the anarchists and hippies and thugs at the G2O protests.

See the blood? Probably fake. These are a bunch of kids, either studying somewhere, or your run of the mill loser. They love to wear bandannas over their face because it looks cool. They show up wherever the text message or e-mail from "protest central" tells them to. They couldn't spell capitalism, much less tell you what it means, but they protest against it all the same.

It's kids with too much time and not enough sense that don't realize that life requires certain responsibilities. The free love and peace generation is over, and all we got from them is promiscuous sex, abortion, and more war. So give it up already.

We know you want to be able to look back at how radical and cool you were, but you really just are stupid and clueless.

They storm banks because they have never taken the time from protesting to hold any real job that would require a bank account.

I have no sympathy for fake outrage wannabes. Capitalism bothers you? Really? Well then, let's take back the millions and billions of dollars given to 3rd world countries from charities that exist off people who made a lot of money OFF CAPITALISM.

Let's take their most hated American President, President Bush. When President Bush became President in 2001, the US spent $1.4 billion a year on humanitarian and development aid in Africa. By 2006, the figure had quadrupled to $5.6 billion a year. Aid that provided Aids prevention and mosquito nets designed protect 5.2 million Tanzanian children from the deadly disease of Malaria.

Remember the capitalist show "American Idol?" They came up with "Idol gives back." The funds benefited six charities. including: the Children's Defense Fund, The Global Fund, Make It Right, Malaria No More, Save The Children, U.S. Programs and the Children's Health Fund.

In 2007 Americans gave almost 300 BILLION in charity. Am I making my point here? Why were Americans able to give so much? The answer would be CAPITALISM.

You see, when people work hard and are not held back by government, they make money. Which is always nice. But what is even better is that we give back. Big time. And in doing that, we save people's lives around the world.

So you young idiots who wear your bandannas and slather fake blood on you, my advice is to get a real job and contribute to society. The more money you make, the more you can give to help the poor.

Wouldn't that be better than waiting by your bong while on government assistance for the next text message of where you can go protest?

Think about it.

Tea Party Update! WOW!

The Tea Party Movement has now confirmed more than 360 cities to host a Tax Day Tea Party on April 15th. We're now in all 50 states!

This is promising to be the largest single day multi location demonstration in our country's history!

A wonderful artist donated her talent for tea party slogans and put them on a web page so that they are free and downloadable. The art is set up so you can take them to a local copy shop and print inexpensive 11″ x 17″ color copies on cardstock. You can download the signs, post the link... pass it on!"

The outpouring of support has been nothing short of amazing, especially since the main stream media seems to be ignoring this. People are just so frustrated and now they have way to vent their frustrations in a postive way!

There will be some big names at the tea parties, but this isn't about big names. It's about the fed up taxpayer saying that our government must stop this out of control spending now!

Get some Tax Day Tea Party gear here. I'm getting the t-shirt that has to logo above.
The Houston Tea Party event on facebook is here.

Felicia Craven, the tea party organizer for Houston was on the Glenn Beck the other day. Watch the video here.

Let your voice be heard!! This is about us and our families demanding that government be responsible and be beholden to the people! We are standing up against wasteful spending and reckless bailouts and budgets supported by too many of those who are suppose to serve us in both parties.

So mark your calenders, blackberries, and iphones. I want to see all of you there! (If you live in Houston or near)

TAX DAY TEA PARTY April 15 Wednesday 4 p.m. lasting indefinitely - Jones Plaza - 601 Louisiana St Houston TX 77201 by the downtown Post Office Houston

It's going to be a GREAT PARTY!

Julie Limbaugh speaks out

Julie Limbaugh, Rush's cousin has a piece at Salon.

It's a well written piece where she whines about how she is treated as a "Limbaugh" by those oh so tolerant liberals who don't even realize that she actually doesn't' agree with Rush (she wants to make that very very clear). How is she treated? Rudely, of course.

In her piece she accidentally reveals two things. One is that Rush is really the nice generous person those of us who do like him hope that he is.

Second, that she is a typical liberal. She hates Ann Coulter although she has never read any of her books or listened to anything she has to say. She bases it all on the media's perception of Ann. At least Julie admits that and realizes this:

"And suddenly I realize that I have become the person I can't stand."

I am assuming the "person she can't stand" is one who judges people before she knows them. One who is so closed minded that she cannot bring herself to actually listen to her cousin Rush on the radio, and maybe open her mind to the possibility that he might have some great ideas (but of course she listens to Jon Stewart).

Julie is a good writer and she realizes some of her flaws, but not all.

Intolerance and a refusal to listen to the other side has to be the worst flaw of all. Whining about how you have had to put up with the intolerance of the left your whole life is also a serious flaw. Maybe if Julie had listened to Rush, learned from Rush, and realized that most of the time he is spot on in his political assessments, then she could have been proud of her cousin and defended him as any family member should.

What Julie will find now is a new found fame. If she can only come up with a bit more meaness in her description of her cousin. If she can bring to the table stories that degrade or demean her cousin Rush, then all the attention she ever wanted from the left will be granted to her. They will have her as a pundit on MSNBC. Keith Olberman will give her a guest spot on his show. Saturday Night Live will offer her a skit.

All she has to do is sell out her family member, sell her soul so to speak.

Will she?

I guess we will have to see.

“If you paid attention you’d be worried too.”

Mona Charon puts it all in perspective:

Let’s imagine that President Obama decides to go help out in Fargo, N.D., where they are experiencing floods. Mr. Obama enters the home of a flooded family. The water is already six inches high in the living room. The president produces a fire hose and begins to douse the room with even more water. “What are you doing?” cry the anguished homeowners. The president fixes them with one of his impatient looks, and explains “May I remind you that I inherited this flood?”

President Obama has reminded us countless times that he inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit. Even if he were about to propose the most responsible, prudent, visionary budget imaginable, that complaint would still be petulant and unseemly. But considering what Obama’s own spending will do to the deficit, it’s jaw-droppingly galling. He now proposes to increase that deficit to $7 trillion in ten years. And that $7 trillion is probably a low estimate (the Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will be $2.3 trillion higher).

The house flooding analogy is a perfect example. Obama decries the spending of the Bush administration while he spends more than all our past Presidents combined. It's like throwing grease on a fire.

So, to review, it was terrible for President Bush and the Democratic Congress (the president neglects to mention the latter) to saddle him with all this debt. His answer is to triple it. That’s showing ‘em!
...................................................

....the current gusher quite takes your breath away. In just the first two months of his term, President Obama has proposed the largest increase in federal spending since World War II. If his budget is enacted, the national debt will be close to 100 percent of GDP in nine years. The Obama/Pelosi/Reid triumvirate is massively increasing government debt at the same time that individuals are struggling to reduce their private debt.

Are Americans getting this? Are they paying attention? I'm afraid not.


I wanted to add this from Gateway Pundit:

**The stock market had its worst January in 113 years.
** The stock market had its worst February since 1933.
** The Dow has dropped faster under Obama than any other new president in 90 years.
** In March the dollar saw its worst drop in value in 25 years.
** And, today we found out that the stock market had its the worst first quarter since 1939.

Never say we didn't warn you

It's mind boggling how quickly we have just opened the door to unfettered government invasion into companies (and banks).

From Wizbang: (emphasis mine)

We are now entering the black hole of statism.

Byron York at The Washington Examiner:

But now, in a little-noticed move, the House Financial Services Committee, led by chairman Barney Frank, has approved a measure that would, in some key ways, go beyond the most draconian features of the original AIG bill. The new legislation, the "Pay for Performance Act of 2009," would impose government controls on the pay of all employees -- not just top executives -- of companies that have received a capital investment from the U.S. government. It would, like the tax measure, be retroactive, changing the terms of compensation agreements already in place. And it would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner extraordinary power to determine the pay of thousands of employees of American companies.

The purpose of the legislation is to "prohibit unreasonable and excessive compensation and compensation not based on performance standards," according to the bill's language. That includes regular pay, bonuses -- everything -- paid to employees of companies in whom the government has a capital stake, including those that have received funds through the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The measure is not limited just to those firms that received the largest sums of money, or just to the top 25 or 50 executives of those companies. It applies to all employees of all companies involved, for as long as the government is invested. And it would not only apply going forward, but also retroactively to existing contracts and pay arrangements of institutions that have already received funds.

In addition, the bill gives Geithner the authority to decide what pay is "unreasonable" or "excessive." And it directs the Treasury Department to come up with a method to evaluate "the performance of the individual executive or employee to whom the payment relates."

Another Obama appointee, another tax problem

Good grief. It's beyond parody now.

You know, it's not just how they all can't seem to pay the proper taxes, it's the gall that they want us to pay so much more.

Kathleen Sebelius, President Obama's nominee to become Health and Human Services secretary, said in a letter obtained by the Associated Press that she made "unintentional errors" on her taxes and has corrected her returns from three different years.

She made "unintentional errors" to the tune of $7000.

Heh. via COC

The Beauty of Gitmo

Miss Universe made a visit to Gitmo.

I think she liked it.

I didn’t want to leave, it was such a relaxing place, so calm and beautiful.

via Hotair